I’m one of those reluctant Trump supporters who are more or less
pleased with his policies, but just wish he’d STFU once in a while.
I’d like a better Republican choice, like Nikki Haley perhaps, but
that’s not in the cards for this year. On balance then, I’d like to see
four more years and a couple more Supreme Court picks for Donald Trump.
|
St, Michael of the Blessed Democratic Party |
None of the Democrats running for president, all 24 of them at one
point, struck me as having anything particularly appealing to offer the
voting public. Mostly a bunch of puffed-up Senators and second-rate
posers/opportunists, but I repeat myself. Biden concerned me for a
little while, but once he appeared on the campaign stage, it was
painfully obvious that he was well past his sell-by date. The first two
contests in Iowa and New Hampshire suggest that the rest of the
Democratic electorate see that too. Trump could have saved himself the
four months of impeachment headaches from that Zelensky phone call. It
turns out Biden was destined to blow himself up without any help from
Hunter or the Ukrainians! Hah! Who knew?
But for the past several months I’ve been concerned … really
concerned, that Mike Bloomberg just might have what it takes to beat
Donald Trump. Bloomberg is a guy with some gravitas. He built a
multibillion-dollar technology company from the ground up. He was, by
most accounts, a successful mayor of America’s largest city where he
regularly dealt with big issues of real significance. Oh … and the
money. Don’t forget the money. He’s got billions and billions of
dollars, and he’s apparently decided he’s willing to spend whatever it
takes to defeat Donald Trump. Judging by what I read, Bloomberg’s
advertising buys are apparently an order of magnitude greater than
anything ever seen before in modern politics.
And I see the appeal of Mike Bloomberg. I kind of like some of the
things he stands for. Despite being currently registered as a
Libertarian, I’m not particularly offended by his support of the
stop-and-frisk policy. It may have been politically incorrect, but
Bloomberg, following in Rudy’s footsteps, recognized that the gun
violence in New York City was largely a problem within one particular
demographic. And that demographic didn’t just describe the perpetrators
of the violence, but the victims as well. Bloomberg supported a
controversial policy that may not have sat well with the ACLU, but it
worked. I guess I’m one of those pragmatic Libertarians. Profiling does
not send me looking for the smelling salts. And today I saw an old video
of Bloomberg talking about how meaningful healthcare reform will
require saying no to some people. Well, duh! What true Libertarian will
disagree with that?
Oddly enough, you know what this card-carrying Libertarian objects to
the most about Michael Bloomberg? His soda ban! While mayor of New York
City, he instituted a limit on the size of your soda cup because he
thought he should decide for you how large a soda to purchase. For your
own good, of course! You were too stupid to make that decision for
yourself. Mike Bloomberg, clothed in the robes of the All-Powerful Nanny
State would make that decision on your behalf.
So I kind of like Policy Mike Bloomberg, but I hate Nanny-State Mike
Bloomberg. How petty is that? Well, as it turns out, not really so petty
after all. Mike Bloomberg is also a gun control freak and a climate
alarmist. So, this Libertarian can comfortably oppose him on solid
policy grounds without having to look like a petulant child throwing a
tantrum because my Mountain Dew portion is too small.
So, back to my previous concern. What if this guy wins? It could
happen. I kind of like him. Some Republicans and plenty of independents
will like him. And the Donald is such a blowhard. He pisses off a lot of
people. So many voters viscerally hate him. Plus, Donald inherited his
fortune and squandered a lot of it. Bloomberg earned every penny of his.
Bloomberg may not be the showman Trump is, but does anybody really
doubt that Bloomberg is probably a lot smarter and way more capable than
Donald Trump?
And the money. All that money! And despite Bloomberg’s nominally
Republican past, he would be a disaster for conservatism in this
country. And he could win. Did I mention that? Abortion-on-demand
judges, trillions frittered away on the Green New Deal, and the Second
Amendment facing the most significant threat in my lifetime. That’s what
a Bloomberg presidency could mean.
Here’s where we stand today: It’s still a crowded Democratic field.
There’s a progressive lane dominated by Bernie Sanders and a so-called
moderate lane still cluttered with a slew of possibly viable contenders,
none of whom can emerge because the others won’t get out of the way.
And to the horror of the Democratic establishment, it’s starting to look
like Bernie Sanders could win with an anemic plurality. Bernie emerges
victorious, by some reckoning, because he is the cleanest dirty shirt.
And swooping in to take advantage of this lack of clarity in the
Democratic race is the seemingly invincible Mike Bloomberg. It’s a
plausible scenario. I was starting to get worried. I was almost
convinced.
But then, something happened. Something changed. I’m still not
complacent, but I see a few green shoots of hope blossoming from the
election results of the past few weeks. It turns out, this Libertarian
isn’t the only one who is worried about Mike Bloomberg. It turns out
there are a lot of Democrats who are worried about him too. I’m starting
to see news stories and anti-Bloomberg ads paid for by other Democrats.
Every other Democrat in the moderate lane opposes him because he’s
their competition. They resent his Johnny-come-lately entry into the
race while they’ve been slogging away for months. They resent his
bottomless well of money that will be spent against them before any of
it is spent on Trump. And they resent that he is climbing up in the
polls based on advertising while never having had to face the scrutiny
of the debate stage.
If the moderates resent him, the Bernie Bros absolutely despise him.
He represents everything they hate in politics. Bloomberg is a
billionaire former Republican who is buying the election, and who, no
matter what he says now, has had impure thoughts in the past on some of
the most sacred tenets of progressive orthodoxy. The moderates, if
defeated, will fall in line behind Bloomberg. But Bernie would probably
cut off his left testicle before he would endorse Mike Bloomberg for
president. Some of the Bernie Bros will swallow hard and vote for Bloomberg.
Many will stay home or vote Green. Oddly enough, the Donald will likely
convince some to vote Trump in 2020. Either way, the edifice that is
Mike Bloomberg seems to be slightly less imposing now that his
Democratic opponents have seen fit to focus more attention on him. And
the irony is that if Bloomberg is defeated, it will not be at the hands
of Donald Trump, but at the hands of his fellow Democrats. The same
fellow Democrats for whom he represents, even if they don’t realize it,
the only real possibility of beating Donald Trump. Trump should lay off
of Mini-Mike for the time being. Let the Democrats beat up on Bloomberg
for him. It’s time for the Donald to channel his inner Napoleon. Don’t
interrupt your enemies while they are destroying themselves.
The irony of this situation is difficult to ignore. If Bloomberg wins
the Democratic nomination, he alienates, perhaps permanently, a
sizeable portion of the Democratic coalition. If he loses, he cedes the
stage to a much more beatable alternative, no matter who that is.
Republicans, who have the most to fear from Mike Bloomberg, needn’t lift
a finger to oppose him, at least not yet. Democrats are rushing forward
to take up the banner against him. After months of campaigning by a
lackluster group of Democratic presidential candidates, one late arrival
starts to emerge as someone who actually has the capacity to beat
Donald Trump. A star has appeared in the eastern sky. A potential savior
has been born unto the Democrats to wash away the sins of months of
clumsy, ineffectual, and at times viciously adversarial campaigning, and
the response of the rest of the Democrats is to try and smother the new
arrival in his crib. Mike Bloomberg, the brightest hope the Democratic
Party has for rescuing them from four more years of Donald Trump might
just end up being defeated by the very people he is trying to rescue.
It’s a funny old world.